Monday, November 29, 2010

Hiroshima


The August 31, 1946 issue of the New Yorker magazine featured just one article.

It had never happened before in the magazine’s history and it has never happened since. A 31,000 word article written by American writer John Hersey that chronicled the day an atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city, Hiroshima, as well as a detailed look at the aftermath. The article follows six citizens of the city and takes us through their daily lives, including what they were doing the exact moment the bomb hit, and how all six of them dealt with the after-effects of the bomb. And Hersey’s article made an immediate impact. The issue of the magazine was sold out around newsstands within hours and there were many requests for reprints. Even radio jumped on board, and the ABC radio network pre-empted regular programming to broadcast the text in four 30-minute programs. Other radio stations around the United States soon did the same thing.

A big reason why I think this article was so successful was the way that Hersey relayed the information to the readers. In an objective and non-judgmental way, he just reported the facts. And, frankly, the facts were good enough to make this story jarring and unforgettable. Another effective way that Hersey made this story successful was that he portrayed the Japanese people as just straight up human-beings. You have to remember, in the mid to late ‘40s, the Americans just thought of the Japanese as the enemy. They didn’t care that the Japanese people had families, ran businesses, lived an everyday life. They were an enemy of war, let’s go after them. So imagine an American reader in the 1940’s picking this up and realizing “Wow, they’re actually just like us.”

For once, the American perspective had been missing from a World War II piece of work. And for myself, this wasn’t a bad thing at all. Like many of those American citizens in the 1940s, all I have heard is the American side of things. Watching the documentaries on the American stations like I have, and reading the books published in America like I have, I’ve always heard one side of the story. Reading Hiroshima, I obviously gained another perspective. So to say this book had an effect on me is an understatement. It shocked me. Hearing these frightening stories of the Japanese trying to survive after the devastation of this atomic bomb is pretty eye-opening. And this had to have been Hersey’s goal when writing this article and judging from the popularity of the article, it seemed to have worked.

The obvious thing that journalists can learn from this book is that the more research done, the more effective the piece of work will be. We don’t know the exact amount of time put into this article by Hersey, but no doubt it took him months and months to get all this information. It also points to the fact that journalists must have a strong stomach to do their job. Hersey did countless interviews in Hiroshima and probably had to hear the gory details over and over again. Situations like this pop up in journalism all the time. Not events of the Hiroshima calibre, but events like murders, stabbings, and other tragic stories that sometimes feature detail that can be too much for someone to handle. Journalists have to throw their emotions out the window when it comes to this stuff. You’re there to report what is happening. It may not be easy, but it’s what you’re paid to do. Give a huge amount of credit to Hersey for doing this.

I guess I could compare Hiroshima to many of the 9/11 survivor stories that I’ve read and documentaries that I’ve watched. Just like the Hiroshima survivors, the 9/11 survivors at the World Trade Center went above and beyond to help those in need. It’s basically the many little stories behind the big stories, in this case, the big story of 9/11 and the little stories of all the survivors. A specific example of a documentary I can think of is one about Brian Clark, a survivor from the South Tower, who tells the entire story of his journey from the time the plane hit, to the time the tower collapsed. This documentary is told by Clark in his own words, unlike Hiroshima, but it’s still a “behind the scenes” look at a disaster.

John Hersey set out to create an article that informed the people of the United States, and the Western Hemsiphere, of what actually was going on in Japan. And as a result of great journalistic technique, and other great writing characteristics, Hersey created a masterpiece.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

The Heidi Game


On November 17, 1968, one of the most famous professional football games was played in Oakland, California.

The reason it was so famous? Not because of an amazing play or an individual performance.

But because of a memorable decision made by the television station it was on. NBC decided to edit out the ending of the football game so that they could show the movie "Heidi."

Here's the story.

The game between the Oakland Raiders and New York Jets was a pretty big one with both teams battling for playoff position. The game started at 4:00 eastern time, and footbal games usually finish in about 3 hours or so. And here's where it got interesting. NBC had signed a contract with the movie's sponsor, Timex, to start the movie Heidi at 7:00 sharp, whether the game was still going or not.

Sure enough, the clock read 6:59 pm and the score read New York 32, Oakland 29 with 1:05 left in the 4th quarter.

And at 7:00 pm, the game, which was exciting and going down to the wire, had been cut off for Heidi.

People freaked and phoned NBC to complain. And guess what happened? The Raiders scored 2 touchdowns in 1:05 and won the game 43-32. And nobody in America saw it.

Since that day, a close football game has never been cut off before the end.

Monday, November 22, 2010

When the News Went Live




















On this day 47 years ago, one of the defining moments in American history took place. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. Not only did it change history forever, but it brought changes to the world of journalism as well.

Credit to PBS.org for this look into how November 22, 1963 brought television journalism into the picture.


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/oswald/press/

How did Americans learn of the assassination on November 22, 1963?

You have to remember that there were very few TV stations, and people had not yet had the kind of event that would cause them to corral around the TV. This was the very first time that TV brought the public together. The first relays of what had happened went out on radio, by the way.

Television did what was unthinkable back then -- it stopped all broadcasting and all commercials. It stayed with the story for four days. It did everything it could to provide people with ongoing information. From Friday to Monday it provided the American public with an ongoing visual screen of what was going on in the assassination story.

I think that today when crises happen we go immediately to the TV. People don't even think twice. When 9/11 happened people turned on the TV set, even in schools.

In the Sixties that was not the case. TV news was hardly coming of age at that time. We only had 15-minute newscasts. It was very elementary. This was a really new experience.

How did the media cover the assassination?

This was really the event that TV news journalists like to claim brought them to age. In 1963 TV journalists were seen as the fluff journalists. Print journalists were the serious journalists. When the Kennedy assassination occurred, of course, TV cameras were able to roll 24/7, and so what you got was an ongoing attentiveness to the event that print could not provide. We got ongoing continuous coverage of the story.






In a day of journalism firsts, another first took place just two days later. Lee Harvey Oswald, JFK's apparent assassin, was himself shot to death two days later in the first live murder ever witnessed on television.


Wednesday, November 17, 2010

What's in your bowl?

A few weeks ago in editing class, we touched on how many names of stadiums, roads, buildings are named after prominent figures or sponsors.

An example we mentioned is how many stadiums around North America and the world are named after a company.

Bank of America Stadium in Carolina
Minute Maid Field in Houston
Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia

These are just some of MANY examples of company-named stadiums. In fact, we are probably a few years away from major sporting trophies being named after companies.

The Pepsi Super Bowl
The Tim Hortons Stanley Cup

Can you imagine?

American College Football has already done this in a pretty big way. At the end of each season, there are about 30 games called "bowl games" that teams play in. There's a national championship game and then there are these 30 other bowl games, which, frankly, mean nothing.

But don't tell that to the big companies. They have no problem associating their names with the bowls.

A long time ago, there used to be a few bowl games every year. The Rose, The Cotton, The Sugar, The Orange. That's it.

Now there's the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl

Advocare V100 Independence Bowl

PapaJohns.com Bowl.

Roady's Humanitarian Bowl.

The St.Petersburg Bowl presented by Beef O'Brady's.

Heck, even the classic bowls have been given brand names. The FedEx Orange Bowl. The Allstate Sugar Bowl.

Why the Roto Rooter Toilet Bowl hasn't been thought of yet is beyond me.

Monday, November 15, 2010

The greatest fictional journalist of all-time is.......

In previous posts on this blog, I've mentioned some of my favourite journalists from the past and the present. But now I think it's time to reveal my favourite "fictional" journalist.

I'm talking about any sort of journalist character in a movie/cartoon/fictional piece of work.

Who's the first name you think of? Well, there are so many noteworthy ones, let's list off a few before I reveal my selection.

Ron Burgundy (Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy)
















The anchor of the KVWN Channel 4 News Team in San Diego has won 5 fictional Emmy Awards.


Lois Lane and Clark Kent (Superman)






















The two backbones of the fictional "Daily Planet" newspaper.



Carrie Bradshaw (Sex and the City)















The star of "Sex and the City" has positions as a New York newspaper columnist and a Freelance writer at Vogue Magazine.



(Wait a minute, did I just mention "Sex and the City" in my blog??)



Other notable names:

Les Nessman (WKRP in Cincinnati)

April O'Neil (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles)

Tricia Takanawa (Family Guy)

But my all-time favourite fictional journalist has to be the Channel 6 Emmy Award-winning anchor in Springfield. He's the host of "Smartline" and "Eye on Springfield" and has a "My Two Cents" segment at the end of every newscast.

Ladies and gentlemen, the greatest fictional journalist of all-time, from "The Simpsons"........

Kent Brockman!





















Why do I say this? Well, here are a few examples.

He works hard on getting his pronunciations right.



He asks the tough questions.



He is passionate about the big issues.




And finally, he's hungry for news and he's hungry for the truth.


Wednesday, November 10, 2010

The King of Defamation

I know I blogged about Don Cherry once before, but considering our editing class is talking about libel and defamation, why not hear from the king of defamation himself?

In fact, if they had a defamation hall of fame, they might have to name it after the hockey analyst.

The CBC television star basically goes on air and says whatever he feels like.

This is a great example of Cherry ripping on a player saying he "blackmailed" the team. But then the coach of the team comes on and accuses Cherry of slander.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

My Favourite Writer Goes Missing...

I was 13 when I started really paying attention to the sports section of the newspaper and reading it more and more.

Every morning, I would get up and immediately find that day's Winnipeg Free Press and read what my 3 favourite writers had to say. The 3 T's. Ed Tait, Randy Turner and Scott Taylor.

Tait covered and still covers the Bombers. When I was 13, I cared a lot more about the CFL then I do today, so his articles were must-read for me.

Turner has always given his humorous take on the hottest local sports topics, and I like to try to resemble his style when I'm writing.

Taylor was considered the lead sportswriter. He travelled to Super Bowls, Stanley Cups, and other huge sporting events. When Scott Taylor was writing it, I knew it was big. His articles were the first that I would find to read.

(Side note: My dad played hockey for the University of Winnipeg Wesmen back in 1980, and Taylor covered the university hockey scene back then for the Free Press. So Taylor would interview the players, including my dad, on occasion. Back in 2004, I used to tell my dad how I would read Scott Taylor every morning. My dad would reply with"'Scott Taylor is an idiot". Then again, isn't this how most athletes feel about certain sportswriters?)

And then one day, Scott Taylor was gone.

I was stunned. How could the Free Press let go of this guy? My mornings were ruined.

This is when I discovered the seriousness of plagiarism.

In a November 2004 article about the NFL, Taylor apparently used a quote from a USA Today article and presented it as his work.

Taylor strongly denied the accusations and eventually resigned from the paper.

I know I had heard the term before but I don't think I realized that it could lead to something as serious as termination from a newspaper.

So I asked around(family, teachers) and was given the same answer. They told me plagiarism is something you don't do.

I don't know when everyone else learned about plagiarism, but for me it was in November of 2004.

Fortunately, Taylor has bounced back from the incident and is the sports director for a number of radio stations in Winnipeg as well as the sports editor of Grassroots News and One Magazine.

And I'm glad that my first favourite sportswriter has kept his career moving after an incident that could have completely ended it.


Here are some interesting quotes from a 2004 article I found online:

This is Taylor's take on the incident:

"Whether it's true or not, it's basically a death sentence," said Taylor. "I can't defend myself from it."

Here is a wise journalism instructor's take on the incident:

Duncan McMonagle, a journalism instructor at Red River College and a former editor at the Free Press, said the incident will compromise the integrity of the newspaper and its journalists.

"As a result, readers could easily say, 'Boy, I'm going to have to second-guess everything I read in the Free Press,' said McMonagle.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

"Play it again, Sam"

Two major Winnipeg newspapers were thinking the same thing on Wednesday night. They watched as Sam Katz defeated Judy Wasylycia-Leis to retain his mayoral position for four more years. So they decided to grace the front page of their respective newspapers with a very creative and original phrase that would help them sell papers the next morning.

Play it again, Sam.

And sure enough, as the Winnipeg Free Press and Winnipeg Sun were distributed Thursday, there was the exact same headline on the front page of each paper.

Can you imagine the scene at the newsrooms on Thursday morning. Did the WFP writers have to hold Margo Goodhand back from storming down to the Winnipeg Sun offices? Did the Sun have to do the same for their editor?

I have so many questions regarding this occurrence. First of all, has this ever happened in the history of Winnipeg newspapers? I find that hard to believe.

My other big question is: Could this have been prevented? Probably not. I think this whole thing was just a fluky occurrence and we probably won’t see it again. Who knows, maybe Margo will send down spies to the Sun headquarters to make sure this never happens again.

All I know is that the first thought in my mind and probably many other Winnipeggers when seeing the duplicated headline was “Come on, guys.” You’ve got a bunch of creative minds in each newsroom. Couldn’t somebody have come up with a more unique headline?

So let’s help the editors out a bit.

Here are three headlines that popped up in my mind as possible alternatives to "Play it again, Sam"

Winnipeg Sam (A play on Yosemite Sam)
Katz one of the mayoral greats
No more waits, It’s Katz

Ok, I’m going to stop right there before I embarrass myself even more. But I do know there are tons of headlines out there that could have been used.

I’ll open the floor to anybody who wants to take their best stab at a headline.

Monday, November 1, 2010

From a biased perspective...

One of the golden rules of announcing is not to show any sort of bias whatsoever.

I can't tell if this video below shows bias or not.



Ok.



A few weeks ago, I wrote about how wrestling announcers may have the hardest jobs when it comes to sports journalism. The ability to act like they have no idea what is going to happen even though they already do.

But after yesterday, my opinion changed.

Meet Paul Allen.



Now Paul seems very happy in this picture. But currently, Paul is having a rough year. You see, he is the official radio voice of the NFL's Minnesota Vikings on KFAN-AM in Minneapolis.

And for those of you who follow the NFL, you would know that the Minnesota Vikings, who were expected to be a powerhouse in the NFC, sit at 2-5 this year.

In fact, every game they play this year is almost comical. There are 2 reasons for this.

1) Brett Favre

2) Paul Allen

With Allen being the voice of the Vikings, he does play-by-play for every single game. Throw in the fact that he does a radio show on the station every day, and one thing is clear...this guy is a Vikings fan.

Here's where it gets interesting. Imagine having to watch your favourite team every week, but having to commentate the game to thousands of people.

Sounds easy and fun right? A dream job.

Sure, it can be great when your team is winning all the time, like Allen's Vikings last year.

But when the team is struggling, it can be a little trickier. Imagine having to commentate from a neutral perspective while your team is stumbling around the field and losing games. The Vikings stink this year. And poor Paul Allen is taking it pretty hard.

Yesterday, as I listened to portions of the radio broadcast, Allen sounded like he was going to drown himself in one of the 10,000 lakes that Minnesota is known for as the Vikings were defeated again. He was clearly depressed. He showed no enthusiasm.

We'll cut Allen some slack here. He is on Minneapolis radio, and NOT National radio, which would be a lot bigger of a deal. The audience tuning in is probably 90%Vikings fans anyways and they are feeling the same way as Allen. They're probably not going to be offended by Allen's biased announcing.

I'm picking on Allen right now, but every team in professional sports has a biased announcer, whether on a local tv station or radio station. And 95% of these announcers are professional enough to stay calm and broadcast the game as if they were just a random announcer calling the game. The other 5% throw professionalism right out the window. Paul Allen is one of them. But I feel for Paul. His job has to be one of the hardest there is when it comes to sports.

I'm a big San Diego Chargers fan and watching these games and trying to stay in control is hard enough. So if I was ever asked to commentate a Chargers game, I would politely decline. I would be a nervous wreck. I would show no professionalism. Basically, I would have to be removed from the broadcast booth halfway through the game.

So the next time you watch your favourite team screw up and you voice your displeasure, just thank the sports gods that your thoughts and opinions are not being recorded live for thousands of people to hear.

Cue Paul Allen.